Operation SCF

Sarath Chandralal Fonseka commanded the Army in the victory of war. He recently told the SundayLeader that Gotabharya ordered to kill surrendering leaders of LTTE. The SundayLeader is notorious for  publishing articles which are harmful to the country. Everybody know the paper is pro-Ranil. Surath Fonseka was thinking he belongs to UNP and made those comments. The SundayLeader and Sarath Fonseka wanted to attack Gota because both of them are angry with him. The SundayLeader  does not care about Sarath Fonseka since their main enemy is Gatabhaya.  On Sunday Sarth Fonseka, in his news conference, said the claim in the SundayLeader was not a war secret and mentioned the same thing without naming anyone. Everything backfired and on Monday Sarath held hurried organized news conference on the advice of JVP and Mangala. At that meeting he did not refuse it but said he was misquoted. He said anyone in the army did not violate any human right law. He said nobody came to surrender waving flags. He said the SundayLeader will publish correcting note.

But today Frederica Janszof of the SundayLeader said that they have not misquoted General Fonseka at any stage.  As far as I know there is a court order to the SundayLeader not to publish abusive news articles regarding Gatabhaya. So I don't think they will publish something what Sarath Fonseka has not told.  He knowingly or unknowingly fell into the trap. But damage has been done.

It is bad if Army killed the surrendering LTTE leaders. The government has rejected these claims from the beginning. They accepted that there had been attempts to surrender and during the incident they were gunned down by the LTTE. But now Sarath Fonseka saying there were no attempts to surrender.  As far as I know he has told different story in Ambalangoda. There are lot of contradictions.  Now the government will be getting more pressure from the West and NOGs for war crime investigation. The government should decide on that. It is totally wrong Sarath Fonseka mention third party information (he now say he got information from a journalist who was with Shavendra Silva.) on the incident to anti-government newspaper. The SundaLeader did their job to get international funding.

I will quote guardian.co.uk article named "Sri Lankan government killed surrendering Tamil Tigers, says general".  It start by saying "Sacked commander running for president says three rebel leaders were machine-gunned on minister's orders". The SundayLeader said they were shot now it has become machine-gunned, which may be true under the circumstance. The article then describe what Sarath Fonseka told the SundayLeader. Then they add supporting information. I will enumerate those supporting informations in the article.

1. A Tamil eyewitness account said Nadesan's wife, a Sinhalese, called in Sinhali (Sinhala) to the soldiers: "He is trying to surrender and you are shooting him." She also died in the hail of bullets.

2. Despite disavowing his earlier remarks, Fonseka's claims about the circumstances surrounding the three men's deaths resemble contemporaneous reports in regional and western media, including the Guardian, that were denied by the Sri Lankan government.

3. Fonseka's whereabouts during the incident was also a matter of confusion. He told a press conference in Colombo on Sunday that he was in China. It was unclear how this statement could be reconciled with his appearance on Sri Lankan state television on 18 May to proclaim victory over the Tigers and confirm that their leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, had been killed. "We can announce very responsibly that we have liberated the whole country from terrorism," Fonseka told Rupavahini television.

4. His claims about what happened last May, and subsequent backtracking, will be viewed in the context of his presidential campaign.

5. Fonseka's allegations echo a report published in June by a Sri Lankan human rights group, University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna), that cited army sources in stating that a "politically ordered massacre of people who wanted to surrender or surrendered" had taken place.

The most important point for me is forth one. There they have said that they would view subsequent backtracking in the context of his presidential campaign. So I believe the pressure on the government will be drastically increase due to the remarks of Fonseka.

Common Hate Candidate

I was thinking the real "common" reason behind the so called common candidate of opposition(CCOO). It is the willingness to abolish executive presidency. Everybody wants to abolish it so they have get together to achieve the goal. Is that really executive presidency they want to get rid of or the person inside that post.

Wait. They all have that. What? They have hatred against Mahinda.

1. Sarath Fonseka (the CCOO) wanted to get power of commanding the 3 security forces. Rightly so Mahinda did not give these powers. He was sidelined and make ceremonious commander. He had problems with Gotabhaya and Mahinda. Now he sole motive is to take revenge.

2.  Ranil Wickramasingha is playing a double game. He wants to destroy both Sarath and Mahinda. As long as Mahinda is there he can not win election. He wants to remove Mahinda but can not do by himself. So he brings Sarath. Ranil is not sure whether Sarath will fulfill the promises about abolishing executive presidency. He is not sure whether there will be a military government or not. But he can be happy because if Sarath wins Mahinda and Ranil in the same boat. If he looses he can be leader of the party and contest next presidential election.

3.  JVP is angry because Mahinda divided the JVP. But it was JVP over-estimate their power. They should have contested 2006 local council with UPFA. But they thought it was JVP got the vote no PA. They could not defeat the budget because of Wimal. Now they are angry with Mahinda because he is supporting Nation Freedom Front. Mahinda also stealing patriotic votes.

4. Mangala supported Mahinda to win election in 2005 and he wanted to be prime-minister. But Mahinda rightly so did not appoint him as premier. But he gave him very important ministries.  He try to abuse powers of foreign ministry and Mahinda removed him. So he is angry with Mahinda.

5.  Hakeem is angry because Mahinda divided Muslim congress. Hakeem is loosing grounds among Muslims. He lost bargaining power. So he is angry.

6.  Everybody knows why Mano Ganeshan is angry with Mahinda...

So it is obvious these people have only one common stuff. That is hatred towards Mahinda. So I would name Sarath Fonseka as "Common Hate Candidate".

I, Me, My, Myself, Mine

What I have noticed from Sarath Fonseka's interviews and public speeches is that he is his extreme individualism. That was the most worrying factor when I was considering voting Sarath Fonseka for presidency.  He is untested as a politician.  He is already showing that in his 1 month old career.  Ranil Wickramasinghe is a better option that Sarath Fonseka.

This is one of the comment he made.


ප්‍රශ්නය - ද්‍රවිඩ ඡන්ද පදනම පිළිබඳව ඔබේ ස්‌ථාවරය මොකක්‌ද? ඔබ විශ්වාස කරනවද ඔබට ද්‍රවිඩ ඡන්ද හිමිවන බවක්‌.

පිළිතුර - ද්‍රවිඩ ජනතාව මා වෙනුවෙන් ඡන්දය භාවිත කරයි කියලා මම විශ්වාස කරනවා. දෙමළ ජනතාව ත්‍රස්‌තවාදී ග්‍රහණයෙන් මුදවා ගත්තේ මම. මගේ සැලසුම්, මගේ හමුදාව, මම අණ දුන් හමුදාව, මමයි සටන් මෙහෙයුවේ. නාවික, ගුවන්, පොලිස්‌, සිවිල් ආරක්‌ෂක බළකාය සහයෝගය ලබා දුන්නත් වැඩිම කැපවීම කළේ හමුදාව බව හැමෝම දන්නවා. ද්‍රවිඩ ජනතාව ඒ ගැන කල්පනා කළොත් ඒ අය මට ඡන්දය දෙන බව මම විශ්වාස කරනවා.

---Sarath Fonseka Sunday Divaina--

Count how many I, me, my Myself in this answer. This is similar characteristics in almost all his talks.

I recently read an article by writer Malinda Seneviratne (malinsene@gmail.com) about this feature.  I will quote one paragraph here.

Sarath Fonseka, bowling from the Sarath Fonseka Pavilion end, passes Umpire Sarath Fonseka to bowl to Sarath Fonseka. Sarath Fonseka takes it on the half-volley and drives it past a diving Sarath Fonseka fielding at Cover Point. Sarath Fonseke runs across from wide mid-off to stop the ball inches before it reaches the boundary, collects and sends in a perfect return to Wicket Keeper Sarath Fonseka who whips the bails off. It is a close call and Leg Umpire Sarath Fonseka refers the matter to third umpire Sarath Fonseka who declares that Sarath Fonseka has just made his ground. This leads to words being exchanged between Wicket Keeper Sarath Fonseka and Sarath Fonseka the batsman. Fisticuffs ensure and play is held up and Match Referee Sarath Fonseka is called on to arbitrate.

You can Read the article here.

You know how Sarath Fonseka screwed up by wanting to own all good stuff and give bad stuff to Gota. That backfired in two ways. In the first, People start saying that Sarath Fonseka betrayed the Army and Sri Lanka. In the other, it gave the impression that Gota is the commander.  Yesterday he said it is a misinterpretation. But today I read in AdaDerana that Frederica Jansz has said she has not misquoted General Fonseka at any stage. 

Error 404 - Not Found

This is what has happened to Ajith P. Perera the Badaramagama  UNP organizer after Sarath Fonseka's betrayal. He started writing his blog post as follows. 

Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s daring revelation sends shock waves across the government Dare to be different December 14, 2009

Presidential aspirant, former Army Commander Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s statement to yesterday’s Sunday Leader that it was Gotabhaya Rajapakse who personally ordered the killing of LTTE leaders Balasingham Nadesan, head of political wing, Vijitha his Sinhalese wife and Seevaratnam Pulidevan, who led the rebels’ peace secretariat (while they were attempting to surrender, reportedly unarmed and carrying a [...] ඉතිරියත් කියවන්න »



Now it is Error-404 - Not Found.  The same thing will happen to Sarath Fonseka's comment in the SundayLeader.  :-)